This blog entry outlines my personal thoughts regarding
learning theories and instruction as I reflect on the material that has been
discussed throughout the course, Learning
Theories and Instruction (EDUC 6115).
Foreword
Having taken another course on topic of
learning theories and instruction approximately three years ago, I did not
discover any new information that I found to be shocking or striking in this
subject matter. I did, however, develop a clearer picture on the practical
application of learning theories in today’s instructional environment.
Clarifying Aspects of my own Learning and
Instruction
I considered myself to be a visual and
auditory learner prior to the start of this course. This opinion has not
changed. I also fervently defended constructivism, believing that this learning
theory was the best for my specific style of learning (Conner, 1993). Throughout
the past eight weeks, my single-minded perspective regarding the practical
application of learning theories has become more open-minded. I now realize
that several learning theories work well with visual and auditory learners.
Additionally, I have realized that as an instructor there are several factors that
I must consider, in addition to the learning styles of my students, when
choosing a learning theory.
Making
Connections
The primary job of instructional designer
is to seamlessly integrate motivational factors, learning theories, and learning
styles with technology. These areas of learning are strongly connected can
impact one another positively and negatively (Millar, 2003). Therefore, it is
essential to understand how they are connected.
The creation of the a table that outlined how various learning theories
(behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, social learning, and connectivism)
answer definitive instructional questions
such as “How does transfer occur?”
and “What types of learning are best
explained by this theory?” helped me to clarify the connections between
learning theories, learning styles, and technology (Ormrod, Schunk, and
Gredler, 2009) . Similarly, the creation of a table outlining my plan on how to
overcome some common motivational factors that impact the learning process
(achievement, anxiety, choice, relatedness) using Keller’s ARCS model (Keller,
2003) allowed me to gain a deeper understanding of how the use of a specific
learning theories or type of technology could greatly impact motivational
factors of my students.
Summary
This
course is essential to an aspiring Instructional Designer. Throughout this
course I have developed a clearer picture on the practical application of
learning theories in today’s instructional environment. I also gained an
appreciation for the intricate connections between motivational factors,
learning theories, learning styles and technology. The tools that I have
created throughout with course (the aforementioned tables) will be invaluable
as a quick, easily updateable reference in future courses and in my career as
an instructional designer.
References
Keller, J. M. (1999).
Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction
and distance education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (78).
Retrieved June 22, 2012 from http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/detail?sid=0ab0c47a-aeb2-4f9f-a7f8-b6cbfba69082%40sessionmgr12&vid=1&hid=10&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl
Millar, R., (2003).
Benchmarking best practices in adult learning centres. Retrieved March
24, 2009 from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/CASAE
Ormrod, J., Schunk,
D., & Gredler, M. (2009). Learning Theories and Instruction (Laureate
custom edition). New York: Pearson.